Social services for Nazi victims have been supported by a grant from the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany.
Funds have been provided by the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany for the Emergency Assistance Program for Nazi Victims at the direction of the United States District Court supervising the lawsuit In RE: Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation (Swiss Banks).

Log in


Thursday, 08 October 2015 12:06

During the Holocaust Rememberance Day held in Larissa on the 27th of January 2015 the Metropolitan Ignatius of Demetrias made the following address:

I would like to begin by expressing my deep gratitude to the Jewish Community of Larissa, for inviting me to be the keynote speaker at this year's memorial event for the Greek Jewish martyrs and heroes of the Holocaust. Although approximately 70 years have passed since the tragic events of the Jewish genocide at the hands of the Nazi regime of the Third Reich, the memories remain—and must remain—particularly fresh and vivid. The deep human solidarity with the Jewish people and its millions of victims helps toward this end, but unfortunately, this solidarity coexists with an ever-increasing anti-Semitism that has been festering across Europe, including here in Greece, a country affected like few others by the Nazi atrocities. In my talk today, I would like to offer a few thoughts, primarily from my perspective as an Orthodox bishop of the Church of Greece. I will highlight some basic theological criteria for approaching the issue, while also offering the historical experience of our humble Diocese of Demetrias, which I have been blessed to serve for many years now, and which, as we all know, played an important role throughout the period of occupation in protecting our fellow Jewish citizens.

 Before proceeding, however, I should note the following: All of us who are present at this beautiful commemorative event today in Larissa accept that the Holocaust is, without a doubt, the event that divided the history of the troubled 20th century in two, stamping the long history of persecution of European Jews with its abysmal violence and brutality. With Hitler's Nazism, the inhuman spirit of anti-Semitism reached its apex in the heart of enlightened and civilized Europe. Herein lies the great lesson that we must learn from the tragedy of the Holocaust: atrocities are committed not only by uncivilized, primitive, and perverse monsters, but also “normal” people, civilized and educated, affectionate fathers, good husbands and conscientious professionals, just like the German Nazis, who actually belonged to Europe's most civilized country, the country of music and philosophy, of classical and biblical studies, art and literature. We are experiencing a similar situation today with the rapid spread of similar racist attitudes, which find fertile soul in various regions—including, lately, in our country, which until recently seemed unthinkable.

To begin, then, I would like to mention briefly the following fundamental parameters that express the faith and consciousness of the Orthodox Church. The theology of the Church is not simply an intellectual exercise, but above all a liturgical doxology and expression of the experience of the divine/human community, as that community lives it at both the personal and communal levels of its members’ lives. Taking this clarification as our starting point, one needs to bear in mind the following:

1. The starting point of Christian theology and the ecclesial experience is none other than the self-revelation of God Himself. This self-revelation takes place within the history of humanity in the person of the Son and Word of God. It is a manifestation of God to man, without discrimination and restrictions, which aims to create a free and loving relationship of dialogue and reciprocal interpenetration. The revelation of God is a quintessentially public act, which reveals God’s concern for the salvation of His Creation. It is to this end that He established His covenant with ancient Israel and, later, renewed it with all of humanity in the person of Christ, an event that highlights the catholicity of the Christian message of salvation. The common Abrahamic origins of Jews and Christians—which underscore their ultimately “fraternal” roots—, together with the universal character of God’s salvific action within history, combine to completely preclude any tolerance for—much less collusion with—inhuman phenomena such as the ideology of anti-Semitism. God “wants all men to be saved” and this refers to the whole of humanity. In this plan of Divine Providence for the salvation of man, the Old Testament between God and Israel, even though it was fulfilled with the coming of Jesus Christ, has never ceased to maintain its soteriological importance and role, inasmuch as God would never retract the initiative that He once took toward humankind.

2. At the same time, the event of the Incarnation of the Son and Word of God within history reveals something equally important. Christ assumed the whole of human nature, the whole man. He was in no way limited by the constraints of gender, race, color, religion, social class, etc. but rather, through His teaching and His actions, highlighted the uniqueness of the human person, far from the attitudes and conceptions that darken, even a little, God's image in man. It suffices for us to recall the parable of the Good Samaritan, which points up the uniqueness of human existence and dignity, as well as unconditional solidarity with each and every person. Christ gave humanity the priceless gift of the personal mode of existence, the mode in which God Himself exists, a mode of being and life based on unconditional love and openness to every other person, which makes man a quintessentially relational being, who cannot live without constant, genuine encounter with each and every other, without racial, social, or religious differences hindering the peaceful and fraternal coexistence between people. The life of the Church and of Christians, when it is based on the example of Christ Himself, cannot help but reflect and express this concise mode of approaching the other, of witnessing to the irreducible and unique value of every human being, since, as the Apostle Paul reminds us, “There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28 NRSV). In this context, it is unthinkable for Christians to adopt any form of racism, and especially anti-Semitism, and it can never express the consciousness of the Church. In this context, we often forget that Christ himself was born a Jew according to the flesh, first addressing His message of salvation to His fellow Jews (“salvation is from the Jews”), who never ceased, like all of humanity (“Jews and Greeks, slaves and free...”) to form part of the plan of Divine Providence—instruments of salvation, according to the mode of God.

3. The quintessential place wherein this ethos takes concrete shape—or at least ought to become reality—is none other than the Holy Eucharist. This is the mystery that constitutes the Church, the expression par excellence of its self-consciousness and its identity, which offers—if only for a moment and in part—a real foretaste of the personal mode of existence of the Triune God, which will be fully revealed in the coming Kingdom, in God’s future final salvific intervention. One of the key features of the Eucharistic identity of the Church is that this is the place in which every kind of exclusion based on traits of nature—such as race, gender, social, religious, or other differences—is relativized to the point that the only thing that matters is the unique and unrepeatable nature of the human person as the image of God and as God’s creation. Is it possible, therefore, for a Christian, as a member of the Eucharistic body of Christ, to embrace—consciously or unconsciously, for any temporal, political, or broader ideological reason—any racist or other inhuman ideology such as anti-Semitism, which rejects from the outset the unique character of each and every person? Whenever we celebrate the Divine Liturgy in our churches, we pray “for the union of all,” a prayer that refers to the unity and salvation of all humanity, not only of a certain class, race, or group—religious or other. Consequently, the ecclesiastical consciousness, when it is alive and expressed in specific manifestations of ecclesiastical life, witnesses to the example of Jesus Christ Himself, who drew close to those who were suffering, persecuted, socially and ethnically outcast as the “cursed” of the earth, giving a clear example of how we, His disciples and ministers, ought to live together if we truly desire and are looking forward to eternal life. You cannot love God Whom you cannot see and hate your fellow man, with whom you must share your daily life and the goods of the earth, to paraphrase John the Evangelist. Is it possible, therefore, to claim, as the Church or as individual believers, that we are following the sacrificial example of our Founder, and putting into practice His salvific message, when we embrace inhumane ideologies that are contrary to all of the above? Anti-Semitism is not about some economic theory, which can lead to individual social injustices, but rather a threat that invalidates the very definition of man as such, inasmuch as it turns him into an object, de-humanizing him and invaliding his personal otherness, which is a non-negotiable truth of the Christian faith, with roots that spring from the life of the Holy Trinity and the future Kingdom.

This timeless faith and consciousness of the Church, as described briefly above, has been incarnated and expressed very often throughout the course of its history, as in the cases of great hierarchs such as Archbishop Damaskinos of Athens, Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Zakynthos, and the our ever-memorable predecessor Metropolitan Joachim of Demetrias, who each, in his own way—motivated by genuine Christian sentiments—, contributed to saving thousands of Greek Jews. I would like, therefore, at this point to speak more about the life and work of my predecessor, the late Metropolitan Joachim (Alexopoulos) of Demetrias, who, through his actions, put flesh and bones on the theological criteria we described above, thus contributing to the salvation of thousands of our Jewish compatriots during the difficult years of Nazi occupation.

We will not refer here to the multifaceted role that Metropolitan Joachim played in the resistance movement against the German yoke. We will focus only on his contribution in saving hundreds of Jews, who lived in his diocese, from Nazi brutality. According to official data from the Central Israelite Council of Greece, at that time (1943), the Jewish community of Volos had approximately 872 members, which, led by Chief Rabbi Simeon Pesach, had developed a very strong social and economic life.

In September of the same year, when German forces asked the authorities in Volos for information on the Jewish citizens of the region, the Chief Rabbi turned immediately to Metropolitan Joachim, requesting his assistance in order to counter the perceived risk. As the Metropolitan himself later related, in an account that has been confirmed by many other sources, his relationship with the Chief Rabbi was excellent. As soon as the latter told him of his fears, the Metropolitan asked the sympathetic German consul of the region, Helmut Sefel, about the occupiers’ intentions. The Metropolitan then immediately advised the Chief Rabbi that all Jewish citizens in the area should leave as quickly as possible. To this end, the ever-memorable Metropolitan composed a handwritten letter of recommendation, which still exists, directed to all the priests of the villages of the diocese, as well as the leaders of the resistance, and all other Greek citizens, asking them to assist in any way possible with the Chief Rabbi’s effort to save the Jews. At the same time, Joachim, without a second thought despite the obvious risks that such a move entailed, safeguarded, at the request of his Jewish compatriots, many valuable objects that belonged to their community; he also did not hesitate to later publicly implore the people of his diocese to return any valuable objects that belonged to Jewish families before they fled the area, “so that they too can live now that we all have attained the freedom of our country.”

In the same account, Metropolitan Joachim expressed his gratitude for the fact that God had given him the ability to contribute to the rescue of his Jewish compatriots, thus demonstrating practically his true and deep sentiments towards them, without being pulled by the stereotypes of religious prejudices, but rather inspired by an eminently humanitarian solidarity for the salvation of every human being, which, as we have seen, is made in the image of God.

In the years after the occupation (1949), in the same spirit and on the occasion of various expressions of misconduct by some residents of the city of Volos, who attacked the Jewish synagogue and sang inappropriate songs against the Jews on Holy Friday, the ever-memorable Joachim invoked “the true Christian spirit of tolerance and love for our fellow citizens, the Israelites,” thus expressing on the one hand the true ethos of the Gospel and the ecclesiastical consciousness of the Body of Christ, and on the other the radical opposition to and explicit condemnation of any kind of inhuman racist behavior, which stands in stark contrast to a Christian’s very identity.

According, again, to official statistics from the Central Israelite Council of Greece, 26% of the Jews in Volos fell victim to the Nazis, making it the lowest in Greece. This testifies in the clearest and most unequivocal way to the important role played by our predecessor Metropolitan Joachim’s general attitude and behavior in those difficult circumstances. In concluding our remarks about Metropolitan Joachim’s contribution to saving the Jews of Volos, we should note the following:

1. Chief Rabbi Moses Pesach generally acted in the best possible way for the salvation of his flock, but especially by appealing for help to the Orthodox bishop, whose timely and trustworthy advice about Jews’ “exodus” from the city of Volos he accepted with absolute confidence.

 2. Metropolitan Joachim undertook the grave responsibility of advising Chief Rabbi Pesach to convince the approximately 900 Greek Jews of Volos to swiftly abandon their homes, their shops, their jobs, and their property, and to flee to the mountains even as winter approached, dragging along the needy elderly, young children, the sick, and disabled. The trustworthiness and Christian charity of both the Metropolitan and his confidante, the German consul Helmut Sefel, saved the Jewish Community of Volos.

 3. Despite the Nazis’ clever ruse to simply seek a directory of Jewish citizens, their surprise attack failed.

4. The Jewish Community of Volos could conceivably have had zero losses. As it was, they lost 130 individuals, mainly poor day laborers, vendors, and Jewish family men who could not afford to live in the surrounding villages and therefore went down into the city. On the night of 24-25 March 1944, they were captured by the S.S. and taken to the Nazi crematoria.

The significance of Metropolitan Joachim’s contribution is also evidenced by the fact that the Yad Vashem, the authorities on the Jewish victims of the Holocaust, posthumously included the late Metropolitan Joachim among the “Righteous of the Nations,” in recognition of his particular contribution to the unprecedented rescue of the Jewish population of the city of Volos.

Sadly, we have to admit that representatives of the Church have not always maintained a similar stance against racism and the persecution of innocent people, protecting all classes of marginal and persecuted people, such as the victims of Nazi atrocities and anti-Semitic fury. Unfortunately, such distasteful behavior has found fertile ground as a result of—or, rather, on the pretext of—the dire financial crisis being experienced by our people today. Those waxing nostalgic for Hitler-like policies and devotees of the most inhuman ideologies have seized the opportunity to exploit the problems and fears of our fellow citizens, attempting to sow hatred and intolerance toward anyone who is different, and eventually for those who passionately resist the dehumanization of the human person. Many times even we representatives of the ecclesiastical body and many of our faithful have not risen to the challenge, instead adopting an often incendiary and above all anti-Christian rhetoric, that in no way can find any analogies in the bright and shining example of our blessed predecessor Joachim.

As it has been aptly noted, “the Church’s responsibility lies not only in the fact that it embraces and stands in solidarity with those in need -irrespective of racial, ethnic, or religious origin—, but that, with all its pastoral, theological, and practical powers, it publicly testifies that it will not consent to or tolerate, even through its silence, fascist and nationalistic practices, but will cast out from the Church fear-mongering rhetoric and slogans of hate toward the other…,” such as, in this case, our Jewish brothers and fellow citizens.

 In concluding this short address, I would like to refer to the famous words of a Jewish woman who became a Christian and lived a truly holy life, Simone Weil. Weil said that there is nothing worse for a Christian than “to not keep Christ’s commandments, to not honor His Name, and to not be ready to die for Him.” These three negatively worded exhortations by Simone Weil—the keeping of Christ’s commandments, the sanctification of His Name, and readiness to die for Him—are inconceivable without our active commitment against racial hatred and anti-Semitism.

Thus, whenever we hear the anti-Semitic cries—even from ecclesiastical circles—with the pretext of love for Greece and the Greek people, it is imperative that we oppose them not only on the basis of the foundational beliefs of the Gospel, but also on numerous examples of the contemporary consciousness of the Church, which have proclaimed with no uncertainty that racism and anti-Semitism—from wherever and whomever they may come—in no way express the faith and consciousness of the Church. The immutable consciousness of the Church is expressed through the example of great hierarchs, such as Archbishop Damaskinos, Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Zakynthos, and our aforementioned predecessor Joachim, as well as countless anonymous clergy and laity, each of which—in his or her own way, and motivated by genuine Christian sentiments—contributed to the salvation of thousands of Greek Jews. This is the tradition of the Orthodox Church in Greece, and it is this tradition that we will continue to follow, in spite of the many self-proclaimed judges.

Translated by Fr. Gregory Edwards

Copyright  - Powered by Netmasters O.E. 2009